The guidance is approved
A named authority has reviewed the working resource and its source basis.
The implementation method
A transfer is a piece of work. This is how we run it.
MindPave moves one defined responsibility from dependence to evidence: the right people participate, decisions are recorded, recipients practice, and the remaining risk is left in plain view.
The field plan
Five phases, each ending in a decision.
Work can overlap, but approval never disappears. Each phase produces a usable output and an explicit decision about whether the next phase is ready to begin.
- 01
Week 0–1
Frame the work
Client sponsor · MindPave lead
Choose the role, process, or decision that matters most. Confirm the people, source material, business consequence, and intended recipient.
Scope brief, access plan, and baseline
Decision at the gate
Is the work specific enough to begin?
- 02
Weeks 1–3
Capture what experience adds
Knowledge holder · MindPave interviewer · subject experts
Review approved sources, observe the work, and interview for judgment, exceptions, relationships, and escalation points that the documents do not explain.
Source map, capture record, and open questions
Decision at the gate
What is authoritative, disputed, or still missing?
- 03
Weeks 3–5
Build and approve
Knowledge holder · approver · MindPave production team
Turn the captured material into the right mix of Field Guides, SOPs, decision tools, lessons, video, and practice—not one default template.
Approved resources and a role pathway
Decision at the gate
Is this accurate and safe to publish?
- 04
Weeks 5–7
Transfer through practice
Recipient · manager · knowledge holder
The recipient studies the material, works through scenarios, asks questions, and applies the guidance while support is still available.
Practice record, feedback, and revised guidance
Decision at the gate
Is the recipient ready to perform in the real setting?
- 05
Weeks 7–8
Prove and hand off
Recipient · manager · sponsor · advisor when authorized
Validate performance, state the remaining limits, assign maintenance, and return a clear record of what moved and what still needs attention.
Readiness evidence, exposure register, and ownership plan
Decision at the gate
Can the work continue without the original dependency?
Who is in the room
Participation follows authority and responsibility.
- Sponsor
- Sets the business priority, removes access barriers, and accepts the outcome.
- Knowledge holder
- Explains the work, judgment, history, relationships, and exceptions.
- Recipient
- Learns, practices, asks questions, and demonstrates application.
- Approver
- Confirms the source, guidance, and publishing decision.
- MindPave
- Runs capture, production, transfer, tracking, and evidence collection.
- Advisor
- Keeps the broader client strategy and receives authorized progress.
Completion evidence
The closeout record should answer five questions.
A clean-looking library is not proof of transfer. MindPave closes the work against evidence that a client and its advisors can understand.
The recipient can use it
Practice or observed work shows more than reading, attendance, or a completion click.
Exceptions are visible
The record says when the standard path stops applying and where escalation begins.
Remaining exposure is stated
Unresolved dependencies stay on the record with an owner and next action.
Maintenance has a home
A person, review trigger, and update path are assigned before closeout.
Start with a real dependency